Home > Error Code > Error Code Vs Exception

Error Code Vs Exception


What happens after reaching 99x items of a kind? The assumption is that I know how my privates are used, but obviously not the publics. Of course you can say that's a problem with the return-an-error-code approach too, but that approach got here first. The error code tests would need to be executed with exceptions disabled to get meaningful results. –Mika Haarahiltunen Oct 31 '14 at 10:26 | show 2 more comments up vote 19 this contact form

Another problem is that the doomsday device got triggered - which wouldn't happen if an exception were thrown and left uncaught. share|improve this answer answered Jan 14 '09 at 21:12 mslot 1,36052034 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Sign How many try/catch do you put in a method that creates, writes and closes a file? Don't know.

Error Code Vs Exception

Make loop more efficient Why don't my users have separate desktops in Windows 10? So, you're going to throw an exception, huh? But then I have to turn it back on again when I need it. Joel Spolsky has thought one step further and says that programs by such programmers will be full of bugs, and these bugs are of a kind that are hard to find.

  • Which means the full code can faster, or slower, depending entirely on how the code is written and how often exceptions are thrown. –Mooing Duck Jul 25 '14 at 16:31 1
  • Two tails in a row - what's the probability that the game started with a head?
  • Most project types have some kind of overridable method or event that can be overridden/subscribed to in order to implement simple global exceptionhandling code.
  • Using multiple different numerical error codes (-1, -2) as return values for the same function is usually bad style, as clients might do a "== -1" check instead of "< 0".
  • It sounds like this is an unexpected condition though: "If the response command doesn't match a certain format I consider it to be an error." –Jon Skeet Oct 11 '11 at
  • Does it return zero on error?

A few bits are reserved for flags (for example, a severity indication), and the rest are a large set of enumerated failures. That is to say, exception should only be unexpected condition, not common error handling. For errors like that, you want error codes. Which Type Of Testing Requires Stubs And Drivers At least Java makes an attempt to make exceptions better/safer.

I do think that this should be the default behaviour for most functions, However there are plenty of functions in .NET for which I would like to see an overload that Exception Error Code Java For example: C#C++VB Copy public class MyFileNotFoundException : Exception { } In C# and C++, use at least the three common constructors when creating your own exception classes: the default constructor, No clue." ); } Of course, one may declare "i" outside of the try/catch statement (and this is what I'm doing). Refer to these articles. 1.

an InvalidMethodCallException is also a LogicException, as both occur when there's a bug in your code that should be detectable before runtime), and they can be used to enhance the error C# Custom Exception DoSomethingImportant(a); if (retVal == SGOOD) retVal = DoThing2(b); return retVal; } that was easy, wasn't it? C as an intermediate language Error codes vs exceptions: critical code vs typical code Aren't side effects fundamental in complexity analysis? Besides that, many of our customers still run Win9x, NT4 and Win2K which I don't believe have that Error Reporter.

Exception Error Code Java

In the try block, if an exception is thrown it will be caught by the first associated catch block whose type matches that of the exception. One was the C# code generated by ANTLR, a parser generator. Error Code Vs Exception With a perror(), you get just an error string from the bottom layer ("No such file or directory" - which file? The Exception That Grounded An Airline share|improve this answer answered Jan 14 '09 at 21:08 nes1983 8,67623251 Exceptions may help you in debugging, but they are mainly intended to address run-time failures (unexpected ones in

The case for exceptions (at least for me) is that sometimes nothing is done, so you lose the error context, and sometimes what's done is to convert it to another error weblink Using exceptions 3 What's the point of throwing an exception? 2 Java Programming , returning in case of an error 0 exceptions and coupling -3 Throw or return error see more It appears that the GCC flags I used generated unusually slow exceptions compared to the other compilers. Exceptions are for "anything that stops or inhibits the method or subroutine from doing what you asked it to do" ... Exceptions Vs Return Codes C++

STATUS st; st = DoThing1(a); if (st != SGOOD) cout Anubis 2:17 PM on 15 Oct 2003 Ouch... Ben 8:20 AM on 16 Oct 2003 What a glaring omission in your original comparison (under "Clean Code") -- you do not show your exception handling! Even ignoring the probably necessary refactoring of said function, the additional code is no more than what you'd have with status checks, and retains the benefits of exceptions. navigate here So the return value is overloaded: "If it fails, it returns NULL".

I know two real-world apps that had performance problems from the misuse of exceptions. Test Cases Can Be Designed In The Exploratory Testing It's not outrageous to expect the exception itself to contain information about the value of i, or less specifically about the context it was evaluated in and what went wrong. Yes No Additional feedback? 1500 characters remaining Submit Skip this Thank you!

those that prefer implicit handling.

Nothing is well - you sexist #50 Yossi Kreinin on 10.02.12 at 4:12 am @Uri W: I am very willing to have you as a guest author on a technical topic All I can say is that I have seen the techniques work and that I personally do not find them at all onerous. Whichever model you choose, be consistent about how you use it. C# Exception Error Code Mikael Thomsen 4:48 PM on 23 Sep 2009 I am with Ned :-) The "DoSomethingImportant" should properly be put into a finally block.

with the file name in it), because you can't show that to the user. This leads to errors going unchecked, which leads to invisible problems.In a nutshellStatus returns are difficult to use. A great percentage of the lines of code in a program can fail and dealing with every single circumstance individually complicates the program significantly, making it harder to understand. his comment is here Apparently you expect a question to have mostly similar answers for it to be a good question. –Virtlink Aug 1 '12 at 21:23 3 @Virtlink: George is a community-elected moderator

When it is done poorly, code is littered with catch statements, and debugging becomes hell. For instance: public static Lazy GetValue( this IDictionary dictionary, TKey key) { TValue retVal; if (dictionary.TryGetValue(key, out retVal)) { var retValRef = retVal; var lazy = new Lazy(() => I know there are some modern techniques, like multiple return values, can be a solution. It's easy to see if file objects are wrapped but it's less easy to spot all the one-time logical operations that actually would need to be undone upon stack unwinding, and

My assumption is if call this function an Int32 will be returned. Leave this empty: www not searched. Instead of having an object that needs to be initialized before used, let the constructor initialize the object (or initialize when the not-initialized is detected). The content you requested has been removed.

In C you don't have exceptions at all.